‍Well October can't come quick enough then.... The club surely cannot sustain these costs whilst playing in League One.

‍From TAM on Twitter


‍Check out @The_Gazette’s Tweet:

‍Something to look forward to I guess!

What's the 10th October court date for then?

‍I guess it's the last day to hand over the money owed before they take it from him. Lol. 

Jams80 wrote:

What's the 10th October court date for then?

The old thief is paying 6.4 thousand pounds a day in interest. He is fucked.

‍Hopefully that is the reason for the delay and Oyston hasn't got an answer or a plan.

S‍till bothers me that there is a strong feeling that "if I can't have it then nobody can"     

rangers1945 wrote:

S‍till bothers me that there is a strong feeling that "if I can't have it then nobody can"     

‍So be it.

‍Do we know anything about the court case yesterday as the 10th was given as a date. Was this one to do with Oyston's divorce?

‍From the Gazette:

What can we expect from Wednesday’s hearing?

The High Court confirmed to The Gazette that three separate applications will be heard on Wednesday, but they were unable to reveal what they were without prior permission from both parties.

While exact details remain sketchy, it appears applications for orders for sale of Oyston’s assets have been made to help facilitate the long-awaited auction process. Another application could relate to the need for documents and deeds to be handed over. It has also been rumoured that the third application could refer to Oyston’s failure to pay court costs.

It’s not expected Wednesday’s hearing will deliver a killer blow to help force immediate regime change, but it’s likely to be another legal necessity to make progress towards the auctions.

‍Court makers demands. Oyston ignores them.  Episode 17.

‍ Send the fucker to prison and sell his shit whilst he's in there. 

GynnSquarePhoenix wrote:

‍Court makers demands. Oyston ignores them.  Episode 17.

People pay money for that?

‍Blackpool FC, a Kyrgyzstan money-laundering conviction and a non-takeover


https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/oct/18/blackpool-takeover-valeri-belokon-owen-oyston?CMP=share_btn_tw


So the court of appeal in Paris ruled that Belokon did launder money, so he is rightfully banned by the Football League. 

‍Time has run out for old rapey hat.

‍Can I dream that he goes prison and some fucked up prisoner gives Owen a taste of his own medicine? 

Please tomorrow be a good day...

Last time he was in , he paid for minders. 

seasider wrote:

‍Can I dream that he goes prison and some fucked up prisoner gives Owen a taste of his own medicine? 

Please tomorrow be a good day...

‍Bit of a sick comment by me last night. I just get so angry even after a victory.

Big day today hopefully. We need some action now.


seasider wrote:

‍Bit of a sick comment by me last night. I just get so angry even after a victory.

Big day today hopefully. We need some action now. 

‍‍So, do you just hope he gets dry bummed daily?

seasider wrote:

‍Bit of a sick comment by me last night. I just get so angry even after a victory.

Big day today hopefully. We need some action now.

Positive news of upcoming action would be good. I know these things take time, but it needs to start soon. 

‍It will be the same old.  Oyston will be given more time and we will have to keep waiting . 

‍Do we have anyone in court updating us?

‍I think the usual crew will be reporting on AVFTT so I will do what I can to get updates from Twitter. 


‍The big question at the moment is whether Owen will turn up or not. Rumours suggest he won't.

‍23 Pool fans here with more coming in. Disley is there and not Owen - what the actual fuck. Disley better not be giving some speel on how he plans to raise the money!


J4F: Seems OO has tried to argue he has bought shares just hasn’t paid. That means VB has no claim against Karl and Segesta ‍

Owen isn't trying to have the judgement overturned. He's simply trying to claim that Segesta doesn't have any part to play in the payment of the 30 odd million.

Judge confirming he wanted a clean break.
Not bothered who buys VB’s shares but liability to pay is joint and several