I can see why they are looking at it if reduces dissent but not for me. I don't want games to be decided by the number of players on the pitch. A yellow card for dissent should be sufficient.
Why can't they just leave the game alone?
It's all about sensationalism for TV. Going down the road of US sport.
And they need to fuck that VAR shite off before they do anymore damage to our beautiful game
"It's all about sensationalism for TV. Going down the road of US sport."
100% agree with you there Bally.
"And they need to fuck that VAR shite off before they do anymore damage to our beautiful game"
Nothing wrong with VAR, just the idiots operating it making it over complicated.
If they are going to implement this, they have to scrap the current carding system, and implement the same system as rugby.
Rugby has been doing for years and it works well, you get two or three verbal warning, with the ref eventually saying, "one more time and you will be off the field", and then if they do do it again, away they go for 10 mins. That is LESS influential on the game than just giving out a yellow card.
It also means that a red can just be reserved for the most egregious of foul play instead of, for example, two yellows for tripping someone up. Also LESS influential on the game.
The same goes for VAR, rugby has perfected its use, follow the model that works instead of making shit up.
We're years off it being used in the professional game.
TheSuffolkSeasider wrote:What happens if a goalie gets sin binned? Do you just have fly keeper for 10 mins or...?Now I’d pay to watch that.